| THE FIRST STAGE OF
ROTHKO WAS COMPRISED OF 3 BASS PLAYERS, WHAT KIND OF REACTIONS DID YOU
RECEIVE UPON YOUR LIVE PERFORMANCES?
Firstly, thank you so much for even considering
to ask me about the music. Well, at first I think people were surprised to
see us turn up to gigs & plug in our bass guitars, other bands found
it curious, some thought it was a joke, but they were usually bands who
played what always seemed to be Oasis cover versions even though they were
playing their own songs. The thing is, without drums, we had enormous
amounts of sonic space to exploit, & this meant that we could play at
extreme volume, demolishing pa systems along the way...the bass trio will
always be seen as something dubious by a few narrow minded people, but for
me, it was deadly serious. We usually got a great reaction from audiences,
no matter who we played with on the bill. I think our achievements as a
bass trio speak for themselves. I'm very happy with the remnants of that
period of the band.
WAS IT A CONSCIOUS
DECISION TO GO OUT THERE & SAY "LET'S SEE HOW MUCH WE CAN ACCOMPLISH
WITH THIS LINE UP", OR WERE THERE NO INTENTIONS?
Truth is, there was no
plan or thought behind it other than I wanted to make music. I
seriously had no idea of the music scene or what was out there so to
me it just felt like the natural thing to do, but I also thought
we'd just do a small handful of shows & it would evaporate in it's
own time... I honestly, in my wildest dreams, never expected that we
would ever have anything released & if you'd told me I'd still be
here making music nearly 6 years later having worked with some of
the most special & inspirational people I've ever met... well... I'd
have just laughed.
THE BEST QUALITY OF THE EARLIER
ROTHKO MUSIC IS THAT IT IS VERY MELODIC & ACCESSIBLE YET AT TIMES
QUITE EXPERIMENTAL IN THE DIFFERENT TEXTURES YOUR GROUP HAVE CREATED
WITH JUST THE BASS GUITAR. QUITE VAST & EXPANSIVE WITH A VERY
MINIMAL USE OF EFFECTS. DO ANY OF YOUR COMPOSITIONS HAVE PARTICULAR
THEMES / IDEAS, OR DO YOU PREFER THEM TO BE MORE OPEN TO DIFFERENT
INTERPRETATIONS?
There
has been quite a few different things that
happened in the early days. At first, there was no group, it was just
myself, with the help of Nick Olofsson from the group "Cay" at
the controls, recording onto a 4-track. I don 't even know what purpose I
had in recording at the time, but Nick encouraged me along the way. most
of those early recordings appeared on 'a negative for francis' (blowing
the myth of the bass trio out of the water) & I only thought about
putting a group together after I was told that someone could help me with
getting a gig. I hadn't thought about playing live or putting a band
together until then. I continued to record tracks on my own & do
cassette only releases (five in total) for about the first year or more of
the group, & all those recordings eventually found their way onto 'a
negative for francis' - 'forty years to find a voice' and 'no anchor no
chart no rudder no sails' which contained 10 tracks from my early cassette
stuff. It wasn't all about the bass guitar though, it was about sound. I
can't play any other instrument & have always just written stuff on
the bass. There were other things in there too; pianos, voices, sounds
from the TV, sounds from the outside world... all sorts of stuff. As for
effects...I've tried to lay off them as time has gone by. Crawford is a
very technically proficient bassist, far more so than myself, & his
playing style definitely shaped the live sound of the band, I've yet to
hear a more powerful bass player. He's pretty incredible actually. Yes,
some things had a definite theme... in fact for me it's vitally important
regarding titles, especially when it comes to naming singles, albums, EPs.
All the titles mean something to me. I put a lot of thought into it, but
of course it's down to us as individuals as to how we perceive what
anything really means to us on a private & personal basis.
YOUR SOUND HAS A
CINEMATIC FEEL TO IT. HAVE YOU ANY REQUESTS FOR SOUNDTRACK WORK?
People have always said
that, & I dearly wish that I could get some work of that kind, or
even get a track in a film or advert, as to be brutally honest, the
money would sure come in very handy. But the bare truth is that,
even though I have a Publisher, I've never had any requests of that
nature. Unfortunately.
HOW IS THE NEW
ROTHKO BAND WORKING OUT?
There hasn't really been a
'Rothko band' since June 2000. It's just been me & those kind enough
to be involved, although the gigantic input of Delicate AWOL
definitely made 'A Continual search for Origins' a complete band
recording. They helped make that album a very special experience for
me, as I'd wanted to work with them from the very first time I'd met
them & heard them play. Beautiful people.
YOU HAVE ALSO
BEEN PERFORMING IN A SHIFTING LINE UP? CAN YOU TELL US MORE ABOUT
THE DIFFERENCE THIS HAS MADE TO YOUR SONGS?
Since I
split the original line-up, it's been a shifting live group for over
2 years now, it's been absolutely fantastic & liberating. It's made
each gig very different but definitely more exciting. Presently, at
this moment in time, the live line-up is fairly solid, with myself
on bass, Michael Donnelly, also on bass, & Frances Morgan on violin.
it's a very gentle and delicate sound right now, & it shows me that
the music is always open to change. it's what helps keeps it alive.
ANY PLANS TO
DOCUMENT DIFFERENT PERFORMANCES AND RELEASE THEM?
None at all. I really can't
bear to listen to live recordings anymore.
HAVE YOU ANY
PLANS TO VISIT AUSTRALIA FOR A TOUR?
That would certainly
be a dream come true. If I get a couple of tracks on a film or an
advert,(!!) I'll try & come over, but the way things are
financially... sadly I doubt it will ever happen, which makes me
pretty sad, & I'm very sorry to have to say that.
WHAT ARE YOUR FEELINGS
TOWARDS CD COPYING, MP3 AND SHARE WARE MUSIC WEB BASED PROGRAMS?
I think
this is an exceptionally contentious and controversial issue. It
makes me sick to see the big labels saying how hard done by they are
& bleating about 'sales being hit'...they rip their artists off
anyway... but small people like myself (where 50 sales are seen as
amazing) have to dive in to this world of mp3's & embrace it as it's
a good way of getting sound & information out there... I'd be lost
without it to be honest...but I'd be lying if I said I was totally
happy about the situation ..I'm now running my own label to put my
stuff out & believe me, selling 50 copies goes a long way to paying
the mastering costs etc... & if small labels want to keep putting
things out they have to rely on sales far more so than the huge
Sony's & BMG's of this world... yet they want it stopped & we want
it to grow... you see my point? It hurts the small label/artist much
more so than the major ones. The big labels aren't bothered about
their artists, they say they're 'protecting the music buying public'
- bullshit - a CDR done well is of totally equal quality to a shop
bought CD. They're upset because they aren't in control. It's a
difficult issue to talk about. As I said, I'd be lost without having
a web-site where people can find out stuff about what's happening
with the music. It isn't perfect, but what is?
YOU HAVE A BURN ON
DEMAND CDR RELEASE AVAILABLE ON THE
BURNING SHED
LABEL ("No Anchor, No Chart No Rudder No Sails) WHAT ARE YOUR
OPINIONS ON CDRs BECOMING MORE WIDESPREAD FOR INDEPENDENT LABELS IN
THE FUTURE, AFTER THE LINEUP CHANGE DO YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT CDR
RELEASES?
'No anchor no chart...' has been on
sale with the fantastic Burning
Shed for over 2 years now. If you look at their catalogue now,
it's very extensive indeed & will grow & grow I'm sure. I'm thinking
of putting out some CDR releases also, it's a great way of getting
things out & I'm a firm believer in it. One reason that
Burning Shed are so successful is that they can keep costs down
by producing cd's to order & their packaging quality & design is
just superb, & they distribute the money from any copies sold
directly to the artist. I think they lead the way in the field. A
rare & precious label indeed. As I mentioned earlier, 'no anchor..'
contains mostly things I recorded on my own either before the band
started or just afterwards. Changing the line-up was a matter for me
of my psychological well-being. I had no choice. The first release
on my own label was originally going to be mail order CDR, but then
it grew into something more, into a proper album, so I decided to
put it out properly, but there will be some CDR's once I get some
nice packaging sourced.
THERE IS
DEBATE IN REGARDS TO USING LAPTOPS FOR LIVE PERFORMANCE? DO YOU
AGREE WITH THE "AS LONG AS IT SOUNDS GREAT ITS OK" PREFERENCE, OR DO
YOU BELIEVE IN GIVING AN AUDIENCE MORE OF A SPONTANEOUS IMPROVISED
PERFORMANCE USING LIVE INSTRUMENTATION COMPARED TO SITTING BEHIND A
MONITOR? It's whatever works
for the person making the music I think. If they feel comfortable in
front of an audience with a laptop... then great, let them do it. It
somehow grants certain people instant credibility too for some
reason I've yet to figure out. But out of the endless list of those
I've seen using a laptop, I've only seen/heard about 3 or four
people do anything remotely interesting in live performance using
one, namely, Richard Thomas, Kid 606, Simon Fisher-Turner and Kaffe
Matthews. I've been in audiences watching people watch people using
a laptop, & it baffles me. At one 'gig', while there was someone on
stage looking intently at his laptop, someone turned & said to me
'is he answering his e-mail?' Myself, I prefer to play backing
tracks using a cd or mini-disc player. At least they don't crash.
Unless the batteries run out. |